Thèse de doctorat en Droit privé
Sous la direction de Jean-Marie Auby.
Soutenue en 1995
à Bordeaux 4 .
Le président du jury était Jean-Marie Auby.
Le jury était composé de Jean-Marie Auby, Michel Véron, Sophie Gromb, Jean-Pierre Duprat.
Les notions de droit a l'information et de consentement du malade ont subi une evolution importante au cours de ces dernieres decennies. Ce renforcement des principes est directement lie au changement de comportement des usagers de la sante, face a la maladie et au corps medical. Les usagers beneficient aujourd'hui non plus seulement de devoirs mais aussi de droits. Affirme par la jurisprudence des 1859, le principe du consentement a recu aujourd'hui valeur constitutionnelle. Le probleme de la revelation du diagnostic grave "dire ou ne pas dire la verite au malade" reflete quant a lui toute la difficulte de la relation medecin impatient. La reponse a cette question reside davantage dans un changement de comportement que dans une demarche de contrainte.
The right of the patient to be informed face to the medical and surgery practice
The notions of the rights to be informed as well as the patients consent have deeply evolved during the last decades. The reinforcement of those principles is directly linked to the behaviour of the health consumers, coping with deseases as well as with medical authoriries. The patients nowadays not only have duties but also have rights. Stated as soon as 1859 by statute law (jurisprudence), the principle of the patient's consent has been granted a constitutional status today. All the difficulties incountered in the relation between doctors and patients are embodied in the ticklish subject of the severe diagnosis disclosure "to tell or not to tell the sick patient the truth". The answer lies in the changing of behaviours more than in a compulsive approach.